Cybersecurity WP-ADZ-1-C

Learning Outcomes:
AD1_U01 - The student interprets legal provisions and basic legal concepts related to cybersecurity and cybercrime in the context of specific factual situations.
AD1_U02 - The student gathers, organizes, and evaluates the information needed to analyze an incident or cyber threat, using appropriate sources and digital tools.
AD1_U04 - The student analyzes a cybersecurity incident or cybercrime using methods and tools appropriate to the legal and administrative sciences and draws conclusions.
AD1_U05 - The student applies the relevant laws, rules, and procedures to solve a specific cybersecurity problem, in particular the classification and reporting of an incident or the response to a selected cyber threat.

Satisfactory (3.0)
The student:
identifies basic concepts, institutions, and legal regulations related to cybersecurity and cybercrime;
recognizes the basic legal or cybersecurity issue presented in the case study;
identifies, in general terms, the relevant laws, rules, or procedures applicable to the case, although they may make mistakes or omit some important elements;
conducts a basic analysis of an incident or cyberthreat, relying heavily on the instructor’s guidance;
proposes a solution to the problem, though the justification is incomplete or partially inconsistent;
achieves all relevant learning outcomes at least at the basic level.

Satisfactory Plus (3.5)
The student:
correctly uses most of the basic concepts and institutions in the field of cybersecurity and cybercrime;
correctly identifies the fundamental legal or cybersecurity issue;
selects the appropriate provisions, rules, or procedures, although their application may contain a few inaccuracies;
analyzes the basic elements of an incident or cyberthreat and identifies its most significant consequences;
proposes a generally correct solution and provides a justification for it, though this justification is not yet in-depth;
uses appropriate sources of information and basic tools for analyzing the problem.

Good (4.0)
The student:
correctly interprets concepts, regulations, and legal institutions related to cybersecurity and cybercrime;
independently identifies and analyzes the problem presented in a case study or incident scenario;
correctly selects and applies the relevant laws, rules, and procedures;
gathers, selects, and evaluates the information necessary to analyze an incident or cyber threat;
formulates logical conclusions and presents a correct, appropriately justified solution;
is able to relate the facts to the relevant obligations of entities within the national cybersecurity system or to the relevant regulations concerning cybercrime.

Good Plus (4.5)
The student:
uses terminology and regulations related to cybersecurity and cybercrime fluently and correctly;
independently conducts a multifaceted analysis of the problem, taking into account its legal, organizational, and practical dimensions;
accurately selects and applies laws, rules, and procedures to the analyzed facts;
critically evaluates the information and sources obtained and uses them to formulate conclusions;
identifies possible alternative solutions to the problem and is able to assess their validity;
presents a coherent and in-depth justification for the proposed course of action, making only minor errors.

Very Good (5.0)
Student:
demonstrates a very good command of the topics covered in the course and uses the terminology specific to cybersecurity and cybercrime fluently and precisely;
independently conducts an in-depth and comprehensive analysis of a complex incident, cyber threat, or legal problem;
accurately interprets and applies relevant laws, rules, and procedures, taking into account their interrelationships;
independently selects, verifies, and critically evaluates sources of information and uses them in the analysis;
identifies alternative solutions, compares them, and assesses their consequences;
formulates a comprehensive, logical, and convincing solution to a problem, supported by in-depth reasoning;
demonstrates analytical independence and the ability to apply acquired knowledge and methods to solve new or more complex problems.

Not required

Literatura obowiązkowa
G. Szpor (red.), A.Gryszczyńska (red.), K. Czaplicki (red.), Ustawa o krajowym systemie cyberbezpieczeństwa. Komentarz, Wolters Kluwer Warszawa 2019, ISBN 978-83-8160-442-0 (komentarz dostępny dla studentów w SIP Lex)
Gryszczyńska (red.), G. Szpor (red.), W.R. Wiewiórowski (red.), Internet. Cyberodporność, Warszawa 2025, Wydawnictwo C.H. Beck (monografia dostępna dla studentów w SIP Legalis)
G. Szpor (red.), A. Gryszczyńska (red.), W.R. Wiewiórowski (red.), Internet. Hacking, C.H. Beck, Warszawa 2023 (monografia dostępna dla studentów w SIP Legalis)

Literatura uzupełniająca
A. Gryszczyńska (red.), G. Szpor (red.), W.R. Wiewiórowski (red.), Internet. Solidarność Cyfrowa, Warszawa 2024; C.H. Beck
J. Kosiński, Paradygmaty cyberprzestęczości, Warszawa 2015
B. Kunicka-Michalska, Przestępstwa przeciwko ochronie informacji i wymiarowi sprawiedliwości. Rozdział XXX i XXXIII Kodeksu karnego. Komentarz, Warszawa 2000
A. Gryszczyńska (red.), Cybercrime, Warszawa 2024, Wydawnictwo IWS (80p), ISBN 978-83-67149-76-1, pp. 284, https://wydawnictwo.iws.gov.pl/wp-content/uploads/2024/12/GRYSZCZYNSKA-Cybercrime_www.pdf
A. Gryszczyńska, Człowiek wobec cyberzagrożeń [w:] Cyberbezpieczeństwo - współpraca vs. konfrontacja informacyjna. Prawo-Informatyka-Zarządzanie, red. B. Szafrański, Wojskowa Akademia Techniczna, Warszawa 2025, s. 101-113,
A. Gryszczyńska, Wykorzystanie sztucznej inteligencji w oszustwach inwestycyjnych, Cyberbezpieczeństwo vs. sztuczna inteligencja. Prawo-Informatyka-Zarządzanie, red. B. Szafrański, Wojskowa Akademia Techniczna, Warszawa 2024, s. 135-152.

Additional information (registration calendar, class conductors, localization and schedules of classes), might be available in the USOSweb system:

• Description of WP-ADZ-1-C in USOSweb