Physical chemistry III WM-CH-S1-E5-CHF
The lecture covers the fundamental and applied aspects of electrochemistry at an intermediate level.
The fundamental aspect concerns the behaviour of ions in an electrolyte solution (ionics) and phenomena at the electrode-electrolyte interface (electrode chemistry). Theories of electrolyte solutions, electrical conductivity in electrolyte solutions and mass transport in solutions will be discussed. Within the scope of electrode chemistry, topics relating to the Nernst equation and SEM, half-cells, cells, types of electrodes, phenomena at the electrode-electrolyte interface, and the kinetics and mechanisms of electrode processes will be presented. Analytical techniques based on electrochemistry and the application of electrochemical processes in industry, the energy sector, medicine and other areas of life will be discussed. The course also includes computational and conceptual problems to be analysed during classes.
(in Polish) Dyscyplina naukowa, do której odnoszą się efekty uczenia się
(in Polish) E-Learning
Term 2020/21_Z: (in Polish) E-Learning (pełny kurs) z podziałem na grupy | Term 2021/22_Z: (in Polish) E-Learning (pełny kurs) z podziałem na grupy | Term 2022/23_Z: (in Polish) E-Learning (pełny kurs) z podziałem na grupy | Term 2023/24_Z: (in Polish) E-Learning | Term 2024/25_Z: (in Polish) E-Learning | Term 2025/26_Z: (in Polish) E-Learning |
(in Polish) Grupa przedmiotów ogólnouczenianych
Course coordinators
Term 2024/25_Z: | Term 2026/27_Z: | Term 2023/24_Z: | Term 2025/26_Z: | Term 2022/23_Z: | Term 2019/20_Z: | Term 2021/22_Z: | Term 2020/21_Z: |
(in Polish) Opis nakładu pracy studenta w ECTS
Term 2022/23_Z: CH1_W03
CH1_W10
CH1_W04
CH1_U01
CH1_U02
CH1_K02 | Term 2023/24_Z: (in Polish) Aktywność studenta (nakład pracy studenta w godz.)
Udział w wykładach (30h) – 1 ECTS
Konsultacje z prowadzącym (15h) – 0,5 ECTS
Przygotowanie do egzaminu (15h) – 0,5 ECTS
Suma 60 godz
Liczba punktów ECTS: 60h – 2 ECTS
| Term 2024/25_Z: (in Polish) Aktywność studenta (nakład pracy studenta w godz.)
Udział w wykładach (30h) – 1 ECTS
Konsultacje z prowadzącym (15h) – 0,5 ECTS
Przygotowanie do egzaminu (15h) – 0,5 ECTS
Suma 60 godz
Liczba punktów ECTS: 60h – 2 ECTS
|
Subject level
(in Polish) Punkty ECTS
Learning outcome code/codes
Type of subject
Preliminary Requirements
Learning outcomes
Learning outcomes.
LO1. Explains the fundamentals of electrochemistry.
LO2. Explains the process of corrosion.
LO3. Predicts the behaviour of selected electrochemical systems under the influence of external stimuli.
LO4. Assesses the suitability of selected areas of electrochemistry for specific applications.
LE5. Recognises the role of electrochemical processes in human life and is able to explain this to others.
ECTS description.
1. Class attendance: 30 hours.
2. Preparation for classes: 5 hours.
3. Preparation for assessment: 15 hours.
4. Consultations with the lecturer: 10 hours.
------------------------------------ -------------------------------
Total: 60 hours, i.e. 2 ECTS credits.
Assessment criteria
EK1. Written examination.
Grade 5. The assessment shows that the candidate explains the fundamentals of electrochemistry without any noticeable shortcomings.
Grade 4.5. The assessment shows that the candidate explains the fundamentals of electrochemistry almost entirely correctly, but does not meet the criteria for a higher
grade.
Grade 4. The assessment shows that the candidate explains the fundamentals of electrochemistry largely correctly, but does not meet the criteria for a higher
grade.
Grade 3.5. The assessment shows that the student explains the basics of electrochemistry largely correctly but inconsistently, and does not
meet the criteria for a higher grade.
Grade 3. The assessment shows that, in most test cases, the candidate explains the basics of electrochemistry, but does not meet the criteria for
a higher grade.
Grade 2. The assessment does not show that the candidate explains the basics of electrochemistry, nor that they meet the criteria for a higher grade.
EK2. Written examination.
Grade 5. The assessment shows that the candidate explains the corrosion process without any noticeable shortcomings.
Grade 4.5. The assessment shows that the candidate explains the corrosion process almost entirely correctly, but does not meet the criteria for a higher grade
Grade 4. The assessment shows that the student explains the process of corrosion largely correctly, but does not meet the criteria for a higher grade.
Grade 3.5. The assessment shows that the student explains the process of corrosion largely correctly but inconsistently, and does not meet
the criteria for a higher grade.
Grade 3. The assessment shows that, in most test cases, the candidate explains the corrosion process, but does not meet the criteria for a higher
grade.
Grade 2. The assessment does not demonstrate an explanation of the corrosion process, nor does it meet the criteria for a higher grade.
EK3. Written examination.
Grade 5. The assessment shows that, with no discernible shortcomings, the candidate correctly predicts the behaviour of selected electrochemical systems under the influence of external stimuli.
Grade 4.5. The assessment shows that the student almost entirely correctly predicts the behaviour of selected electrochemical systems under the influence of external stimuli, but does not meet the criteria for a higher grade.
Grade 4. The verification demonstrates that it predicts the behaviour of selected electrochemical systems under the influence of external stimuli correctly to a significant extent, but does not meet the criteria for a higher grade.
Grade 3.5. The verification shows that it predicts the behaviour of selected electrochemical systems under the influence of external stimuli correctly to a significant extent, albeit inconsistently, but does not meet the criteria for a higher grade.
Grade 3. Verification shows that, in most test cases, it predicts the behaviour of selected electrochemical systems under the influence of external stimuli, but does not meet the criteria for a higher grade.
Grade 2. The assessment does not demonstrate that the student can predict the behaviour of selected electrochemical systems under the influence of external stimuli, nor that they meet the criteria for a higher grade.
EK4. Written examination.
Grade 5. The assessment shows that the candidate evaluates the applicability of selected areas of electrochemistry to specific applications without any noticeable shortcomings.
Grade 4.5. The assessment demonstrates that the student almost entirely correctly assesses the suitability of selected areas of electrochemistry for specific applications, but does not meet the criteria for a higher grade.
Grade 4. The assessment demonstrates that the student assesses the suitability of selected areas of electrochemistry for specific applications to a significant extent correctly, but does not meet the criteria for a higher grade.
Grade 3.5. The assessment shows that the student assesses the suitability of selected areas of electrochemistry for specific applications correctly to a significant extent, albeit inconsistently, but does not meet the criteria for a higher grade.
Grade 3. The assessment shows that, in most test cases, the student assesses the suitability of selected areas of electrochemistry for specific applications, but does not meet the criteria for a higher grade.
Grade 2. The assessment does not demonstrate that the candidate evaluates the applicability of selected areas of electrochemistry to specific applications, nor that they meet the criteria for a higher grade.
EK5. Written examination.
Grade 5. The assessment shows that the student, without any noticeable shortcomings, recognises the role of electrochemical processes in human life and is able to explain this to others.
Grade 4.5. The assessment shows that the student almost fully and correctly recognises the role of electrochemical processes in human life and is able to explain this to others, but does not meet the criteria for a higher grade.
Grade 4. The assessment shows that the student recognises the role of electrochemical processes in human life to a significant extent and is able to explain this to others, but does not meet the criteria for a higher grade.
Grade 3.5. The assessment shows that the student largely, but inconsistently, recognises the role of electrochemical processes in
human life and is able to explain this to others, but does not meet the criteria for a higher grade.
Grade 3. The assessment shows that, in most test cases, the student recognises the role of electrochemical processes in human life and is able to explain this to others, but does not meet the criteria for a higher grade.
Grade 2. The assessment does not show that the student recognises the role of electrochemical processes in human life and is able to explain this to others, nor that they meet the criteria for a higher grade.
The final mark x is determined on the basis of the following values:
st(w) = 5 if 4.5 < w; st(w) = 4.5 if 4.25 < w ≤ 4.5; st(w) = 4 if 3.75 < w ≤ 4.25; st(w) = 3.5 if 3.25 < w ≤ 3.75; st(w) = 3 if 2.75 < w ≤ 3.25; st(w) = 2 if w ≤ 2.75
and on the basis of the rule set out below:
● if each of the final marks for the related modules is a pass and their average is y, then x is calculated using the formula x = st((y + z)/2), where z is the weighted average of the marks from the assessments carried out, in which the weighting for exam marks is 2 and the weighting for other forms of assessment is 1
● if at least one final mark for the associated modules is 2 or ‘fail’, then x = 2.
Seven tests worth 4 marks each + one worth 12 marks; a written examination worth 60 marks. Pass mark – 51 marks, of which at least 31 marks must be from the examination
Bibliography
1. Core literature
1.1. „Elektrochemia I. Jonika. Wykłady z chemii fizycznej” A. Kisza, WNT, Warszawa 2000
1.2.„Elektrochemia II. Elektrodyka. Wykłady z chemii fizycznej” A. Kisza, WNT, Warszawa 2001
1.3. „Chemia Fizyczna” P.W. Atkins, Wydawnictwo Naukowe PWN, Warszawa 2001
2. Supplementary lecture
2.1. "Podstawy chemii analitycznej” Tom 2, D.A. Skoog, D.M. West, F.J. Holler, S.R. Crouch, Wydawnictwo Naukowe PWN, Warszawa 2007
2.2. „Chemia dla inżynierów” red. A. Banaś, W. Solarski, AGH Uczelniane Wydawnictwa Naukowo-Dydaktyczne, Kraków 2003
2.3. „Chemia fizyczna dla przyrodników” Lucjan Sobczyk, Adolf Kisza, PWN Warszawa1975
2.4. „Wprowadzenie do elektrochemii” skrypt do wykładów, część I Maria Bełtowska-Brzezinska Wydział Chemii UAM, Poznań 2009
Additional information
Additional information (registration calendar, class conductors, localization and schedules of classes), might be available in the USOSweb system: